I'm re-ordering and slightly re-wording my previous post with emphasis here on New Orleans' 2006 mayoral election which has made no provision for the tens of thousands of displaced New Orleans voters who do not physically travel back to New Orleans to vote. It would be an understatement to say that expectation is not realistic. It's also pretty inhumane not to mention anti-democratic. Yet in spite of the human rights implications (international, not Baton Rouge's or Washington's) they've actually gone ahead today with an election for mayor of New Orleans, La. Tens of thousands of New Orleans voters remain displaced, even homeless, yet in the eight months since Katrina first hit neither the US nor Louisiana government saw fit to arrange "out-of-state polling" in the communities across the United States of America where Louisiana's citizens remain scattered. Ironically financial grants from the US made possible by Americans including New Orleans' displaced citizen-exiles have made it possible for displaced persons and communities in other countries - and those receiving refuge in the USA - to be able to vote in their own countries' elections. Some of those people have voted "out of country" inside the US where they've received refuge, living barely a stone's throw from displaced New Orleanians who have been given no place to vote. In international election missions we work hard to provide "out-of-country voting", absentee voting, and so on. So what's going on here? (continued)
Continue reading "New Orleans: "Out of Country voting" for others but no vote for displaced Americans" »
THINK DARFUR. Do you know of a pension or other public fund that invests in companies sending income to Sudan's government & military? Sudan Divestment Campaign's site features a state-by-state list of US public pensions with holdings in companies investing in Sudan. Alaska's state pension investment board has more than USD$545 million invested in 25 companies doing business with Sudan. These and other companies are based outside the US since in 1997 the Clinton administration embargoed US companies from doing business in Sudan. Click below to see the whole list.
Retirement System (selected) |
Amount invested in companies that do business with Sudan |
No. of companies invested in that do business with Sudan |
Alaska State Pension Investment Board (ASPIB) |
$545,421,969.90 |
25 |
Arizona Public Safety Personnel Retirement System (APSPRS |
$164,904,304.80 |
4 |
Arkansas State Teachers Retirement System (ASTRS) |
$495,826,407.85 |
38 |
California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) |
$7,528,282,236.59 |
44 |
<><>
>
Continue reading "Think DARFUR-Divest SUDAN*- Pension funds remove their cash" »